|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Current Volume
|
Volume 11 - Issue 1 (2007-2008)
|
|
Written by Paul Edwards-Kevin
|
|
While the American jury system is unique and allows the American citizenry to make important decisions, even those concerning life and death, a relatively small number of nations have implemented similar procedures to try their accused. The most recent country that has provided for trial by jury in certain circumstances is Argentina. The Constitution of Argentina, and at least one Argentine provincial constitution, that of the Province of Cordoba, provide for trial by jury. While the Argentine Constitution has provided trial by jury for over 150 years, only recently has that constitutional provision been implemented. Trial by jury was first introduced in the province of Cordoba, Argentina, on August 22nd, 2005. The question remains, why has it taken 150 years for an Argentine court to hold its first trial by jury? While the political reasons for this development in the country are obscure, possible explanations exist that may explain why a jury system has recently been established in one of Argentina’s provinces.
This paper will assert that a combination of factors, economic, political and criminal, were responsible for the recent emergence of the Cordoban jury system. The jury system that Cordoba has implemented will be described at length, including the details of the Luna trial, the first trial by jury in Argentine history. Additionally, the future outlook of the Argentine jury system will be explored in detail. Finally, the American jury system, more specifically, Washington’s system, will be compared to the Cordoban system to determine the positive and negative aspects of each. While it has taken Argentina many decades to institute trial by jury, nonetheless, it has transpired; as Shakespeare’s Petruchio said in The Taming of the Shrew: “Better once than never, for never too late.”
|
|
|
Volume 11 - Issue 1 (2007-2008)
|
|
Written by N. Pieter M. O’Leary
|
|
Within days of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, President George Bush began assembling the Coalition of the Willing. The coalition was made up of countries from all over the globe and ran the gamut from very tiny, obscure nations to clear world powers with obvious common interests in fighting global terrorism. This broad coalition, under the direction the United States, implemented Operation Enduring Freedom designed to wipe out al-Qaeda in Afghanistan as well as the Taliban regime sheltering al-Qaeda fighters.
|
|
|
Volume 11 - Issue 1 (2007-2008)
|
|
Written by Kenneth Kaoma Mwenda
|
|
Despite being legally regarded as minors, women in Swaziland have begun to challenge the status quo. …Leliswe Nxumalo, a widow, sued her in-laws, who had ordered her out of her husband’s house and confiscated all her marital property after his death . . . Under Swazi custom, a widow is expected to marry her deceased husband’s brother and continue bearing children. The family argued that, by tradition, the deceased man’s property belonged to them and not to the widow. They also castigated the widow for refusing to go into a month-long seclusion following her husband’s funeral, as custom dictates . . . Nxumalo countered that she needed to return to work to support herself, especially since her in-laws had confiscated her husband’s estate. The case is among several that have brought the situation regarding Swazi women’s rights into sharp focus . . . Women may not own property or enter into contracts without the sponsorship of a male relative . . . Although a new constitution is expected to improve the rights of Swazi women, critics argue that, like all constitutional clauses, these rights may be suspended by the king, Mswati III.
|
|
|
Volume 11 - Issue 1 (2007-2008)
|
|
Written by Kathleen Morris
|
|
"With the exception of a handful of nation-states, multinationals are alone in possessing the size, technology, and economic reach necessary to influence human affairs on a global basis." Half of the world's 100 greatest powers are transnational (or multinational) corporations. The vast financial power and economic influence of transnational corporations (TNCs) enables them to affect human rights and the environment in a fundamental way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|